D.C. Comics
announced yesterday that it was going to develop a prequel series to Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' graphic novel WATCHMEN, apparently without Moore's blessing. There are a few narratives to this story:
- Moore is famously opposed to any adaptations of his work, including the 2009 movie.
- D.C. owns the characters so he more or less has no recourse as far as that goes. (The Hollywood Reporter quotes artist Dave Gibbons as giving the series his blessing, with reservations.)
- WATCHMEN has a cult following if not a large one, so it's inevitable that these characters weren't just going to sit in the metaphorical vault forever.
As a casual fan of WATCHMEN who didn't completely hate the movie (although a lot of things went awry there, a lot) I am actually sort of excited that there are going to be prequels -- I think there is a lot of depth and richness to the story that, if done right, could span a bunch of new works. It's a shame they couldn't do it in a way that garnered Moore's blessing, but if he was never going to give it, then how should D.C. proceed?
1 comment:
I used to regard Watchmen as a sacrosanct document, and DC's actions would've once struck me as sacrilegious. But I suppose I'm getting old...I realize not everything has to be consumed and actually a fair amount of it can be happily ignored.
Plus, Moore's been treated like crap by DC for so long that this just seems like business as usual.
Post a Comment