Showing posts with label john le carre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john le carre. Show all posts

11 January 2012

Filmbook: "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy" (2011)

Tomas Alfredson's adaptation of "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy" begins, literally, in darkness, as two British intelligence agents are meeting to discuss a private assignment. There are long pauses, and allusions to things that don't make any sense, and then we get two enduring images: A man felled on a cobblestone street, his arms splayed out like a swastika, and the unreadable face of a man whose boss has just resigned for him from a lifelong career. John le Carre's Cold War conspiracy thriller, beloved by many, is short on conventional action and long on recollections and revelations through deduction -- necessary on the page, but would be impossible onscreen. This film is also long, but well paced, quiet but not monotonous (and when we hear it, well scored), and retro without being cutesy. The more I think about it the more I liked it, but I went in prepared.

Gary Oldman as Smiley, the British former agent who loses his job in the opening minutes of the film but is recruited by some of his old coworkers to help root out a mole among the agents, may well be in the most taciturn role to win the Best Actor Oscar. (Unless there's a heartwarming acclaimed story about a mute that I'm forgetting. There probably is.) My favorite "Smiley moment" is when he visits the former secretary at the Circus who was let go just after him, to see if she remembered anything useful, and nothing that happens during that peculiar social call brings up a reaction in him. Nothing! The man barely blinks let alone talks, but something about his glassed-in stare prompts people to keep talking until they've given him the information they want. From what I've read it seems that his performance is a direct acknowlegment of Alec Guinness's turn in the British "Tinker, Tailor" miniseries, although not a complete recreation. I was reminded of Oldman's cop rule in the rebooted "Batman" franchise as the guy who is wiser and sadder than everyone, and what a terrible burden that can be to a man.

Along with Smiley the movie takes a special interest in Peter Guillam, played by Britishest Named Actor Ever Benedict Cumberbatch, who is a lower-ranking agent in the Circus who assists Smiley (though the book gets into why he does a little bit more than the movie). Cumberbatch is a lanky 35 but looks about 19, and between his blonde '70s shag and his weird blue eyes he looks unearthly, like a space alien, or David Bowie in his cocaine and milk phase. There's a scene where he emerges from behind a door to meet someone, and you don't see the the moment of startle on the other person's face, but you can viscerally feel it like it's happening to you. He's terrific, and I regret that people may give up on this movie based on the first hour and not see the best aspects of his performance.

Which is not to say that Oldman and Cumberbatch are the only good actors here, because this movie is like a showcase for British male actors. Toby Jones is at his sniveling best as one of the Circus top brass, Percy Alleline (who I never liked, for the record), and Colin Firth sheds some of his charm as another, Bill Haydon. If we want to talk about people disappearing into roles, let's talk about Tom Hardy, with none of the bravado of his character in "Inception," nor any of the brawn he packed on to play an MMA fighter in "Warrior," as the rogue agent who tries to expose the mole in his own way. Mark Strong is essential as Jim Prideaux, and keep an eye out for Swedish actor David Dencik who is all shifting eyes and flop sweat as Esterhase.

Purists will probably mind, and why shouldn't they? A fair amount of chronology has been shifted from the novel, with le Carre's opening scene of a schoolteacher (the forcibly retired Jim Prideaux, as it turns out) befriending a lonely kid pushed well into the first hour of the film. Even having no great love for the book (which I read about six weeks ago and was startled by the lack of action in it) I was irritated by some of the minor changes made to the book, and one major change I'm not positive of but is still confusing me a little. Here's where I think the adaptation may be a double-edged sword: While I didn't get lost in "Tinker Tailor" I was confused enough, particularly at the beginning, to wonder whether people who hadn't read the book would be lost. On the other hand, familiarity with the source material may interfere with other viewers' enjoyment.  My test case (the friend I went with, familiar with neither book nor movie) reported that the first hour was confusing, and then it all fell into place for him, but your mileage may vary. (He did also point out that the trailer makes this look like more of an action thriller than it actually is... sic semper Hollywoodis?)

Yet I have to give the movie credit for its strongest scene, delivered in flashback, that I'm almost certain was not in the original material but should have been -- snippets of a Christmas party, before the secret mission, before Smiley got fired and as the doubts are setting in. I could watch an entire movie of just that party, but what I was shown was enough. Between that scene and the goosebump-inducing closing montage*, I was reminded that a great adaptation transcends the weaknesses of its source while employing its strengths to make something new and memorable. It can give you chills.

Filmbook Verdict: Read the book, then see the movie. And after you see the movie, you should listen to this great interview with Tomas Alfredson from the Filmspotting podcast.

*Note: While not the last movie I saw in theatres, there are a lot of parallels between this and the Fincher "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo" I just sat through. A somewhat spoilery, disorganized list:  
David Dencik has a small role in "Dragon Tattoo" and a larger role here
Symbolic emphasis placed on a woman who is hardly in the movie (Ann Smiley, George's wife, vs Harriet Vanger in "Dragon Tattoo")
Directors known for horror (Alfredson's last movie was the vampire thriller "Let The Right One In")
The yellow wash on the flashbacks, for that nostalgic tint
Device of flipping through old photos/ microfilm in order to "see" a clue from the past
Importance to the plot, and specifically the denoument, of a cabin in the woods
Character isolating himself to go back decades to uncover something [yeah, I realize that's pretty general]
Looming shadow of World War II as glory days 
Surprising juxtaposition of song + scene near the end 

04 December 2011

"To Smiley, his stoicism had something awesome about it."
- John le Carré

26 October 2011

Filmbook: The Great Prestige Circus of Book Adaptations, Fall 2011

Now playing: "Moneyball," based on the Michael Lewis book of the same name, already receiving Oscar buzz; "The Three Musketeers," adaptation approximately #2745, not receiving any Oscar buzz whatsoever.

Opens Oct. 28: "The Rum Diary" (Johnny Depp) based on the Hunter S. Thompson book about Puerto Rico. I mistweeted when I said the only NY Public Library copy available to me was in Spanish and called DIARIOS DE RON (trans. RUM DIARIES); it's actually DIAS DE RON (RUM DAYS). I probably won't see the movie till I read that but I expect Peter W. Knox will have something up as soon as it opens. Also 10/28: "Anonymous" (I saw it already and blogged about it here), "Sleeping Beauty" (an adaptation of sorts).

Opens Nov. 18: "The Descendants," Alexander Payne's long awaited return to our screens (since 2004's "Sideways" or his heartbreaking segment in 2006's "Paris, je t'aime") -- it's George Clooney! It's Hawaii! It's sur...prisingly heartfelt? Highly anticipated by me in any case. Based on the novel by Kaui Hart Hemmings. Also week of 11/18: "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1" (fourth of the planned 5 "Twilight" movies, in case you're keeping score)

Opens Nov. 24: "Hugo," based on the Caldecott Award-winning THE INVENTION OF HUGO CABRET by Brian Selznick. So it's a kids' movie, fine, but what if I told you that it was a kids' movie directed by Martin Scorsese starring such casual players as Ben Kingsley, Emily Mortimer, Christopher Lee, Johnny Depp (again?) and Michael "Deserves to Be Slightly More Famous" Pitt? Also, the book is spectacular (about the invention of film in turn-of-the-century Paris), but I'm trying to focus on what you want. Take your small cousins or something. It's a mitzvah. Also week of 11/24: "A Dangerous Method," based on the John Kerr nonfiction book of the same name about Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, starring Viggo Mortenson and Michael Fassbender and I don't know why he keeps coming up either, it's a mystery, and "My Week With Marilyn," based on a memoir by one of Monroe's studio escorts while shooting in London (with Michelle Williams as Monroe).

Opens December 9: "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy," based on the John le Carre novel of the same name about Cold War espionage and the search for a plant, starring Colin "Hey do you remember when I won an Academy Award last year? That was awesome" Firth and Tom "Universal Mancrush" Hardy. Hey, did you know this book is almost impossible to find in used bookstores? Also 12/9: "We Need To Talk About Kevin," Toronto-buzzed feature based on the Lionel Shriver novel.

Opens December 16: "Carnage" (dir. R. Polanski), which is technically based on a play by Yasmina Reza but I'm propping it up because the four-handed cast is terrific and there will be fireworks. Also 12/16: "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows" (a tenuous adaptation at best but will probably live up to the "silly but fun" I gave the first movie).

Opens December 23: "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo," U.S. adaptation, tracked here for almost two years.If you think you're going to hate David Fincher's take with Daniel Craig as Mikael "Kalle Bastard" Blomkvist, you could always rent or buy the Swedish trilogy as insurance. Also 12/23: "The Adventures of Tintin," 'starring' Simon Pegg because this is one of those creepy real-ish animation jobs, and "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close," adapting the Jonathan Safran Foer novel in what will probably be an all too realistic 9/11 tearjerker. You have plenty of time to read this book, which I regard very highly, before it comes out. Not much up to Christmas but more holidays anyway.