Showing posts with label brian stelter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brian stelter. Show all posts

13 July 2011

"Sure, I would miss books — and so, by the way, would my children — but at least the death of books would put an end to the annoying fact that everyone who works for me is either writing one or wants to. I would get my staff back!
"Every month, it seems, some reporter drops by my office to request a leave of absence to write a book. I patiently explain that book-writing is agony — slow, lonely, frustrating work that, unless you are a very rare exception, gets a lukewarm review (if any), reaches a few thousand people and lands on a remaindered shelf at Barnes & Noble. I recount my own experience as a book failure — two incompletes, and I’m still paying back a sizable advance with a yearly check to Simon & Schuster that I think of not as a burden but as bail.
"But still the reporters — and editors, too — keep coming to sit in my office among the teetering stacks of Times-written books that I mean to read someday and to listen politely to my description of book-writing Gethsemane, and then they join the cliff-bound lemmings anyway."

--Bill Keller on Brian Stelter's book deal in "Let's Ban Books, Or At Least Stop Writing Them." Okay, old man, time for your nap! Ironically, this article is also a gigantic humblebrag on behalf of the New York Times staff and its prolificacy.

28 June 2011

Smart, Perceptive Person Writes Book I Will Probably Never Want To Read

The news broke yesterday that New York Times media reporter Brian Stelter got a book deal. Well, that's not surprising; they do that all the time, but this one is different in a few ways, and one of those ways is that I don't want to read it.

Stelter says: "Why do morning shows matter? Because they collectively set the nation's breakfast table every day."

...Yeah, maybe 20 years ago, and maybe they still do for your mom, ahem, for the generation of boomers and elderly Americans for whom turning on the television is a natural part of the morning routine. I'd conjecture that that is no longer a natural reflex for most people under 40. Personally, the screens I'm facing in the morning are Blackberry, laptop, iPod and work desktop, in that order. I'll watch a YouTube video, but I'll never turn on "Today," even if I have heard someone I like is going to be on it. Waiting for a particular spot takes too long (hello, generational stereotypes) and there's so much noise, so little significance. I'd rather lie in bed reading my friends' tweets from last night. (Too much? Oh well.)

I point this out because, but not only because, Mr Stelter has taken the step of asking on Twitter and Tumblr for feedback about what people want to read in his just-announced book. The book's microsite asks: "What have you always wondered about morning TV? Who would you like to read more about?" To be honest... nothing, and nobody.

I don't know Mr Stelter, but I don't begrudge him his prodigy rep, as he seems to come by it honestly. I hope to run into him at a party someday as we have something very personal in common that I would like to ask him about (off the record, of course). At the same time, as a regular reader of his work I think his energies could be better spent in about 18 different directions. If he wrote a book about "Jersey Shore," I would read that with relish. How the "Real Housewives" came to be despite not being real and distorting the word housewife into some kind of horror parody of itself... I would read that book. (Someone should write that book, actually. Free idea! For anyone who watches those shows already!) I just lack the dimension to find out the secret behind-the-scenes power of morning shows. I would say that nobody asked me, but, well, the author did, and that is my opinion.

...Watch, it will win 800 Pulitzers and I will be eating these words around 2013. Well, if we're all still blogging and we haven't switched to holograms!